Common Space: Politics and the Production of Architectural Knowledge

Common Space: Politics and the Production of Architectural Knowledge

Djalali, A.

Aureli, P.V. (promotor)
Riedijk, M. (promotor)
Barbieri, S.U. (promotor)

Architecture and The Built Environment

Architecture

2014-05-16

Today we are familiar with definitions of architecture as an integrated, multidisciplinary “networked practice,” which takes its cognitive potential from a “diffused design intelligence.” These definitions were introduced to counter an individual, authorial approach to design which allegedly characterized modern architecture since its beginnings. This thesis aims to overcome such a distinction, showing that, on the contrary, a diffused, collective intelligence was at the core of architectural production since its invention in the 15th century. Renaissance sprezzatura, the monster in Enlightened France, Alois Riegl's Kunstwollen, Aldo Rossi's collective memory and the 1970s debate on architectural language are taken as indexes of a Western tradition of collective intelligence in design. Moreover, this genealogy shows that by embracing “collective intelligence” and “projective” practice architecture does not necessarily surrender to constituted political powers and to the forces of the market. On the contrary, this thesis shows how such a practice can be an instance of a positive and constitutive political force—in other words, able to produce the common.

Architecture
Common
Renaissance
Aldo Rossi
Alois Riegl
Peter Eisenman
Henri Labrouste

https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:52100da1-f6b1-42ce-929a-9fd329ab5d22

2016-05-01

9789461863089

Institutional Repository

doctoral thesis

(c) 2014 Djalali, A.