Representation and similarity: Suarez on necessary and sufficient conditions of scientific representation

Title

Representation and similarity: Suarez on necessary and sufficient conditions of scientific representation

 Author

Poznic, M. (TU Delft Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)

Date

2016

 Abstract

The notion of scientific representation plays a central role in current debates on modeling in the sciences. One or maybe the major epistemic virtue of successful models is their capacity to adequately represent specific phenomena or target systems. According to similarity views of scientific representation, models should be similar to their corresponding targets in order to represent them. In this paper, Suarez’s arguments against similarity views of representation will be scrutinized. The upshot is that the intuition that scientific representation involves similarity is not refuted by the arguments. The arguments do not make the case for the strong claim that similarity between vehicles and targets is neither necessary nor sufficient for scientific representation. Especially, one claim that a similarity view wants to uphold, still, is the following thesis: only if a vehicle is similar to a target in relevant respects and to a specific degree of similarity then the vehicle is a scientific representation of that target.

 To reference this document use:

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:567fc7a2-4b0b-42e6-97f3-a8888abdb8dd

 DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-015-9307-7

 ISSN

0925-4560

 Source

Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 47, 331-347

 Part of collection

Institutional Repository

 Document type

journal article

 Rights

© 2016 M. Poznic
Files
PDF art_10.1007_s10838_015_9307_7.pdf 492.38 KB
Close viewer