Print Email Facebook Twitter An argumentation framework for deriving qualitative risk sensitive preferences Title An argumentation framework for deriving qualitative risk sensitive preferences Author Visser, W.M. Hindriks, K.V. Jonker, C.M. Faculty Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science Department Man-Machine Interaction Date 2011-06-28 Abstract Preferences are derived in part from knowledge. Knowledge, however, may be defeasible. We present an argumentation framework for deriving qualitative, multi-attribute preferences and incorporate defeasible reasoning about knowledge. Intuitively, preferences based on defeasible conclusions are not as strong as preferences based on certain conclusions, since defeasible conclusions may turn out not to hold. This introduces risk when such knowledge is used in practical reasoning. Typically, a risk prone attitude will result in different preferences than a risk averse attitude. In this paper we introduce qualitative strategies for deriving risk sensitive preferences To reference this document use: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:5b31212b-9c2b-4b7e-82e1-3b7aad663b0a Publisher IEA Source Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems (IEA/AIE 2011), June 28-July 1, Syracuse, 2011, 1-10 Part of collection Institutional Repository Document type conference paper Rights (c) 2011 Visser, W.M., Hindriks, K.V., Jonker, C.M. Files PDF 279281.pdf 132.41 KB Close viewer /islandora/object/uuid:5b31212b-9c2b-4b7e-82e1-3b7aad663b0a/datastream/OBJ/view