The project is about designing of a Hyperloop transfer Hub for the future, or as I call it, a Hyperhub. Therefore, a lot of (high)speed train stations have been analyzed as well as international oriented transfer hubs, such as airports and terminals. Due to the position taken in the first stage of the design process, also significant research has been done in the way mother nature designs its structures, for example, the honeycomb, animal skins, cracks in stone, merging of bubbles, structure of snowflakes, and so one. Therefore, research and design had a close relationship between each other during the process. A lot of design decisions have been made by looking closely in to the research done during the past months, somewhat like the definition of research/evidence based design. Objectivity is an essential point to be able to state that a design can be used purely for research purposes. In practice, however, this rarely applies, certainly in architecture due to the fact that also my own approach is mainly evidence based design true the scope of the analysis of relevant reference case studies. The fact that this form of design research in no way describes what the absolute scientific reality is, corresponds with the position of the design studio project, which is about designing a masterplan for the year 2100. This naturally involves a lot of hypothetical questions and assumptions, where it is usually difficult to provide a substantiated argumentation reflecting your knowledge gained by research, but this is exactly why the focus of the studio is primarily on doing thorough research as much as possible. In addition, many impulsive or intuitive decisions were taken as expected, only the research done was mainly focusing on finding a narrative and a style in which to design a future mobility hub. A surprising observation is that there is a strong correlation between the process of research and design. Many elements from the case studies of other existing train stations and infrastructural nodes, therefore, arise almost simultaneously, between research and design. A fruitful interaction between the relatively 'objective' research and the more 'subjective' design process. Research based and evidence based design are research methodologies that can significantly influence design decisions in de whole process. In the Complex Projects studio, most people approach the problems and research questions in a very analytical and data driven way. This elaborates the fact that everyone has to thoroughly analyze, investigate and argue every aspect of the researched area and come up with lots of diagrams and data based drawings. So, one could say that evidence based designing, as it is for me, is more uncomplicated and optimal for this type of studio.