Specification of regret-based models of choice behaviour

Specification of regret-based models of choice behaviour: formal analyses and experimental design based evidence—commentary

Chorus, C.G. (TU Delft Transport and Logistics)
van Cranenburgh, S. (TU Delft Transport and Logistics)

2016

A recent paper published in this journal compares two regret based choice models, and concludes that one of them is theoretically inferior and has a worse empirical performance in the context of a particular data set [Rasouli and Timmermans, Transportation 6:1–22, 2016]. Unfortunately, those conclusions are ill-founded as they are based on a misinterpretation and misrepresentation of one of the two considered models. Furthermore, the paper overlooks highly relevant recent work on the topic, and contains insufficient empirical analyses. Together, these issues make that the paper provides a confusing addition to the literature. With the aim of lifting some of this confusion, this commentary sets out to highlight, and correct where possible, the paper’s shortcomings.

Commentary
Discrete choice theory
Random regret minimization
Regret
RRM

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:863e38d2-9fa9-4dd7-b1ba-066928788697

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9739-x

0049-4488

Transportation, 1-10

Institutional Repository

journal article

© 2016 C.G. Chorus, S. van Cranenburgh