Monitoring Backward Erosion Piping with Self-Potential Geophysics

Monitoring Backward Erosion Piping with Self-Potential Geophysics

Gevaert, Joost (TU Delft Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Slob, E.C. (mentor)
Ngan-Tillard, D.J.M. (mentor)
Jommi, C. (mentor)
Wellmann, Florian (mentor)

Delft University of Technology
Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule
ETH Zürich

Applied Geophysics | IDEA League

2019-12-20

Backward erosion piping is a dike failure mechanism. It is the internal erosion process by which sand is eroded away from underneath a dike or levee by seepage flow. This erosion process progresses in the direction opposite to the direction of seepage flow and forms a small pipe directly beneath the dike. As erosion continues, this process can lead to dike failure. During this erosion process, the groundwater flow pattern is subject to continuous change, due to the growth of the pipe. Self-potential (SP) monitoring is sensitive to changes in the groundwater flow pattern, because of the electrokinetic coupling between fluid flow and the streaming potential. The SP field due to flow underneath a test dike was modeled with a FreeCAD -> Gmsh -> pyGIMLi workflow. This workflow can also be used to effectively resolve a wide range of standard and customizable geophysical modeling and inversion tasks. After modeling, field experiments were conducted, on the same test dike, to further assess the possibilities and limitations of SP monitoring to track the progress of backward erosion piping. Given that it is essential to have an accurate resistivity model in order to find the location of the SP source, an integrated electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and SP monitoring system was designed. The electrodes used in this monitoring system were polarizable stainless steel stakes. The reliability of polarizable electrodes was greatly overestimated, as they turned out to give unstable SP measurements. The reason for the inferior reliability of polarizable compared to non-polarizable electrodes, was found through extensive literature research. The reason being that the largest potential in any electrode originates from the contact between the metal and the electrolytes in solution. The metal of polarizable electrodes is in direct contact with the electrolytes in the soil, which have variable concentrations. Therefore, the potential measured fluctuates together with the concentration of soil electrolytes in contact with the metal. The metal of non-polarizable electrodes, on the other hand, is in contact with a solution of its own salt, which has a constant concentration. Finally, piping is not expected to be measurable with SP monitoring, before a large sand boil is visible in the field. Once a positive SP anomaly develops at the sand boil, changes in the SP field due to the growth of the pipe are expected to be too small relative to the SP anomaly associated with water flow through the sand boil. Even though an integrated ERT and SP monitoring system is known to provide useful information about the hydrology of a dike, such a system is not sensitive enough to be able to monitor the development of a backward erosion pipe.

backward erosion piping
self-potential
dike monitoring
flood proof holland
non-polarizable electrode

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:9bf85910-4939-4159-968b-ef558a6ecb7c

https://doi.org/10.4121/uuid:887b846d-f849-4fb9-bbf3-a10784835cba

Student theses

master thesis

© 2019 Joost Gevaert