An argumentation framework for qualitative multi-criteria preferences

Title

An argumentation framework for qualitative multi-criteria preferences

 Author

Visser, W.M.
Hindriks, K.V.
Jonker, C.M.

Faculty

Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science

 Department

Mediamatics

 Date

2011-12-31

 Abstract

Preferences are derived in part from knowledge. Knowledge, however, may be defeasible. We present an argumentation framework for deriving qualitative, multi-attribute preferences and incorporate defeasible reasoning about knowledge. Intuitively, preferences based on defeasible conclusions are not as strong as preferences based on certain conclusions, since defeasible conclusions may turn out not to hold. This introduces risk when such knowledge is used in practical reasoning. Typically, a risk prone attitude will result in different preferences than a risk averse attitude. In this paper we introduce qualitative strategies for deriving risk sensitive preferences

 To reference this document use:

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:b487f575-6568-47be-b288-80a88085fda1

 Publisher

s.n.

 Source

1st International Workshop on the Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation TAFA, Barcelona July 18-22, 2011, 1-14

 Part of collection

Institutional Repository

 Document type

conference paper

 Rights

(c) 2011 Visser, W.M., Hindriks, K.V., Jonker, C.M.
Files
PDF 279356.pdf 213.98 KB
Close viewer