Reducing the Environmental Impact of Sterilization Packaging for Surgical Instruments in the Operating Room: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable versus Reusable Systems

Friedericy, Herman J.; van Egmond, Cas W.; Vogtländer, J.G.; van der Eijk, A.C.; Jansen, F.W.

doi:10.3390/su14010430

Reducing the Environmental Impact of Sterilization Packaging for Surgical Instruments in the Operating Room

Title

Reducing the Environmental Impact of Sterilization Packaging for Surgical Instruments in the Operating Room: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable versus Reusable Systems

Author

Friedericy, Herman J. (Leiden University Medical Center)
van Egmond, Cas W. (Universiteit Leiden)
Vogtländer, J.G. (TU Delft Marketing and Consumer Research)
van der Eijk, A.C. (Leiden University Medical Center)
Jansen, F.W. (TU Delft Medical Instruments & Bio-Inspired Technology; Leiden University Medical Center)

Date

2021

Abstract

The widespread use of single-use polypropylene packaging for sterilization of surgical instruments (blue wrap) results in enormous environmental pollution and plastic waste, estimated at 115 million kilograms on a yearly basis in the United States alone. Rigid sterilization containers (RSCs) are a well-known alternative in terms of quality and price. This paper deals with two research questions investigating the following aspects: (A) the environmental advantage of RCS for high volumes (5000 use cycles) in big hospitals, and (B) the environmental break-even point of use-cycles for small hospitals. An in-depth life cycle assessment was used to benchmark the two sys-tems. As such a benchmark is influenced by the indicator system, three indicator systems were ap-plied: (a) carbon footprint, (b) ReCiPe, and (c) eco-costs. The results are as follows: (1) the analyzed RSC has 85% less environmental impact in carbon footprint, 52% in ReCiPe, and 84.5% in eco-costs; and (2) an ecological advantage already occurs after 98, 228, and 67 out of 5000 use cycles, respec-tively. Given these two alternative packaging systems with comparable costs and quality, our results show that there are potentially large environmental gains to be made when RSC is preferred to blue wrap as a packaging system for sterile surgical instruments on a global scale.

Subject

Disposable
Medical devices
Operating room
Reusable
Sustainability

To reference this document use:

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:d40c8874-2f20-4abc-a63b-82781401a7a1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010430

ISSN

2071-1050

Source

Sustainability, 14 (1)

Part of collection

Institutional Repository