Print Email Facebook Twitter Age-related compensation Title Age-related compensation: Neuromusculoskeletal capacity, reserve & movement objectives Author van der Kruk, E. (TU Delft Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control; Imperial College London) Silverman, Anne K. (Colorado School of Mines) Koizia, Louis (Imperial College Healthcare) Reilly, Peter (Imperial College Healthcare) Fertleman, Michael (Imperial College Healthcare) Bull, Anthony M.J. (Imperial College London) Date 2021 Abstract The prevention, mitigation and treatment of movement impairments, ideally, requires early diagnosis or identification. As the human movement system has physiological and functional redundancy, movement limitations do not promptly arise at the onset of physical decline. A such, prediction of movement limitations is complex: it is unclear how much decline can be tolerated before movement limitations start. Currently, the term ‘homeostatic reserve’ or ‘physiological reserve’ is used to refer to the redundancy of the human biological system, but these terms do not describe the redundancy in the muscle architecture of the human body. The result of functional redundancy is compensation. Although compensation is an early predictor of movement limitations, clear definitions are lacking and the topic is underexposed in literature. The aim of this article is to provide a definition of compensation and emphasize its importance. Compensation is defined as an alteration in the movement trajectory and/or altering muscle recruitment to complete a movement task. Compensation for capacity is the result of a lack in neuromusculoskeletal reserve, where reserve is defined as the difference between the capacity (physiological abilities of the neuromusculoskeletal system) and the task demand. Compensation for movement objectives is a result of a shift in weighting of movement objectives, reflecting changing priorities. Studying compensation in biomechanics requires altered protocols in experimental set-ups, musculoskeletal models that are not reliant on prescribed movement, and inclusion of alternative movement objectives in optimal control theory. Subject FrailtyMobility impairmentsNeuromusculoskeletal modelsOptimal control theoryRedundancyRehabilitation To reference this document use: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:0043c9dc-1d3b-44fa-9b87-e266c602142a DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110385 ISSN 0021-9290 Source Journal of Biomechanics, 122 Part of collection Institutional Repository Document type journal article Rights © 2021 E. van der Kruk, Anne K. Silverman, Louis Koizia, Peter Reilly, Michael Fertleman, Anthony M.J. Bull Files PDF 1_s2.0_S0021929021001652_main.pdf 1 MB Close viewer /islandora/object/uuid:0043c9dc-1d3b-44fa-9b87-e266c602142a/datastream/OBJ/view