Climate change, as a result from global warming, requires an energy transition: the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and a radical innovation of the global energy system to proceed apace. Offshore wind is an important source of clean, renewable energy, and it plays a key role in the transition. 80% of the worldwide offshore wind is to be produced on locations in deep waters; here floating foundations are required, that to date are far more expensive than their bottom-fixed counterparts. To reduce costs of floating wind energy, reliable, detailed predictions of the system’s loads and motion response are crucial. Floating offshore wind turbine structures are designed using ’aero-hydro-servo-elastic’ software codes that simulate the dynamic response of a floating offshore wind turbine system to the offshore environment. Predictive accuracy can be improved by comparing simulation results from a model of a known system against measurements taken from the real-world system, a so-called model validation. One promising state-of-the-art aero-hydro-servo-elastic software code is BHawC/OrcaFlex, developed by Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy (SGRE). Due to its novelty, however, validation of the code has only been carried out to a limited extend, giving rise to uncertainty about the interpretation of simulation results. The purpose of this MSc. thesis project is to validate the performance of BHawC/OrcaFlex by comparing its simulated load and motion results to measurements on a real-world floating turbine from the Hywind Scotland floating offshore wind farm (Hywind). Measurement data and a description of the ’as-built’ system were made available by the wind farm owner Equinor ASA. In order to establish an achievable level of modelling accuracy and predictive value of BHawC/OrcaFlex, the code was verified against another aero-hydro-servo-elastic software code: OrcaFlex, by setting up a similar model of the Hywind system in both codes. Limited information is available on the performance of OrcaFlex in floating wind load and motion predictions. Therefore, it was in turn verified against a wide range of industry-standard aero-servo-hydro-elastic software codes, using a modeled system that closely resembled the Hywind turbine and load cases that step-by-step increased in complexity, to further isolate causes of discrepancies between the models. OrcaFlex predictions matched very well across all load cases. The main differences were attributed to differently modeled additional linear hydrodynamic damping, as the official damping prescription resulted in prediction errors. In the BHawC/OrcaFlex verification against OrcaFlex, both models were subjected to multiple load cases that step-by-step increased in complexity, to further isolate causes of discrepancies between the models. Simulation results from running both models appeared to be nearly identical, though some discrepancy was observed from due to the simplified aero-servo-elastic OrcaFlex code. The final validation of BHawC/OrcaFlex to full-scale Hywind measurements is performed at below-rated, rated and above cut-out wind speeds with multi-directional wave and current components. In general, BHawC/OrcaFlex motion frequency domain predictions appeared to correspond well to the actual Hywind measurements. Most phenomena in the low-frequency, wave-frequency and high-frequency region were captured by the simulations. However, large errors were observed in the mean surge, sway and bridle line tensions predictions. Most discrepancies were found originating from errors in the model set-up, e.g. lack of hydrodynamic damping, simplifications in the wave model or errors in the mooring system set-up. Tuning of the mooring system showed improvement of the results, but further improvements could be made. Several sensitivity studies were added on parameters, such as hydrodynamic drag, tower damping and mooring drag. This showed overprediction of the surge/sway and roll/pitch frequency responses can be mitigated by both additional linear and viscous hydrodynamic damping. The main recommendations for further research are to further analyse errors identified in the model set-up. In addition, some yet unexplained phenomena that are not captured by BHawC/OrcaFlex in the current model, are to be addressed. Finally, a the development of a standardized approach to relate model validation studies in the field of floating wind to cost improvements could further quantify the value of future comparison studies.