Print Email Facebook Twitter Biomechanical characteristics of rib fracture fixation systems Title Biomechanical characteristics of rib fracture fixation systems Author Prins, Jonne T.H. (Erasmus MC) Van Wijck, Suzanne F.M. (Erasmus MC) Leeflang, M.A. (TU Delft Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics) Kleinrensink, Gert Jan (Erasmus MC) Lottenberg, Lawrence (Florida Atlantic University) de la Santa Barajas, Pablo Moreno (Ribera-Povisa Hospital) Van Huijstee, Pieter J. (HagaZiekenhuis) Vermeulen, Jefrey (Maasstad Hospital) Verhofstad, Michael H.J. (Erasmus MC) Zadpoor, A.A. (TU Delft Biomaterials & Tissue Biomechanics) Wijffels, Mathieu M.E. (Erasmus MC) Van Lieshout, Esther M.M. (Erasmus MC) Date 2023 Abstract Background: The primary aim of this study was to determine and compare the biomechanical properties of a fractured or intact rib after implant fixation on an embalmed thorax. Methods: Five systems were fixated on the bilateral fractured or intact (randomly allocated) 6th to 10th rib of five post-mortem embalmed human specimens. Each rib underwent a four-point bending test to determine the bending structural stiffness (Newton per m2), load to failure (Newton), failure mode, and the relative difference in bending structural stiffness and load to failure as compared to a non-fixated intact rib. Findings: As compared to a non-fixated intact rib, the relative difference in stiffness of a fixated intact rib ranged from −0.14 (standard deviation [SD], 0.10) to 0.53 (SD 0.35) and for a fixated fractured rib from −0.88 (SD 0.08) to 0.17 (SD 0.50). The most common failure mode was a new fracture at the most anterior drill hole for the plate and screw systems and a new fracture within the anterior portion of the implant for the clamping systems. Interpretation: The current fixation systems differ in their design, mode of action, and biomechanical properties. Differences in biomechanical properties such as stiffness and load to failure especially apply to fractured ribs. Insight in the differences between the systems might guide more specific implant selection and increase the surgeon's awareness for localizing hardware complaints or failure. Subject BiomechanicsFixation systemImplantRib fractureSurgical stabilization of rib fractures To reference this document use: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:8c6d5fe9-95cf-4d4c-839a-9b8c5fb78aa3 DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.105870 ISSN 0268-0033 Source Clinical Biomechanics, 102 Part of collection Institutional Repository Document type journal article Rights © 2023 Jonne T.H. Prins, Suzanne F.M. Van Wijck, M.A. Leeflang, Gert Jan Kleinrensink, Lawrence Lottenberg, Pablo Moreno de la Santa Barajas, Pieter J. Van Huijstee, Jefrey Vermeulen, Michael H.J. Verhofstad, A.A. Zadpoor, Mathieu M.E. Wijffels, Esther M.M. Van Lieshout Files PDF 1_s2.0_S0268003323000013_main.pdf 4.95 MB Close viewer /islandora/object/uuid:8c6d5fe9-95cf-4d4c-839a-9b8c5fb78aa3/datastream/OBJ/view