Print Email Facebook Twitter External Human–Machine Interfaces Can Be Misleading Title External Human–Machine Interfaces Can Be Misleading: An Examination of Trust Development and Misuse in a CAVE-Based Pedestrian Simulation Environment Author Kaleefathullah, Anees Ahamed (University of Leeds; Student TU Delft) Merat, Natasha (University of Leeds) Lee, Yee Mun (University of Leeds) Eisma, Y.B. (TU Delft Human-Robot Interaction) Madigan, Ruth (University of Leeds) Garcia, Jorge (University of Leeds) de Winter, J.C.F. (TU Delft Human-Robot Interaction) Date 2020 Abstract Objective: To investigate pedestrians’ misuse of an automated vehicle (AV) equipped with an external human–machine interface (eHMI). Misuse occurs when a pedestrian enters the road because of uncritically following the eHMI’s message. Background: Human factors research indicates that automation misuse is a concern. However, there is no consensus regarding misuse of eHMIs. Methods: Sixty participants each experienced 50 crossing trials in a Cave Automatic Virtual Environment (CAVE) simulator. The three independent variables were as follows: (1) behavior of the approaching AV (within-subject: yielding at 33 or 43 m distance, no yielding), (2) eHMI presence (within-subject: eHMI on upon yielding, off), and (3) eHMI onset timing (between-subjects: eHMI turned on 1 s before or 1 s after the vehicle started to decelerate). Two failure trials were included where the eHMI turned on, yet the AV did not yield. Dependent measures were the moment of entering the road and perceived risk, comprehension, and trust. Results: Trust was higher with eHMI than without, and the −1 Group crossed earlier than the +1 Group. In the failure trials, perceived risk increased to high levels, whereas trust and comprehension decreased. Thirty-five percent of the participants in the −1 and +1 Groups walked onto the road when the eHMI failed for the first time, but there were no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion: eHMIs that provide anticipatory information stimulate early crossing. eHMIs may cause people to over-rely on the eHMI and under-rely on the vehicle-intrinsic cues. Application: eHMI have adverse consequences, and education of eHMI capability is required. Subject automated drivingexternal human–machine interfacesmisusepedestriansrisk perceptiontrust To reference this document use: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:9c8fd086-5fb3-4910-908b-4dfedaa060fe DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820970751 ISSN 0018-7208 Source Human Factors: the journal of the human factors and ergonomics society, 64 (6), 1070-1085 Part of collection Institutional Repository Document type journal article Rights © 2020 Anees Ahamed Kaleefathullah, Natasha Merat, Yee Mun Lee, Y.B. Eisma, Ruth Madigan, Jorge Garcia, J.C.F. de Winter Files PDF 0018720820970751_1.pdf 2.6 MB Close viewer /islandora/object/uuid:9c8fd086-5fb3-4910-908b-4dfedaa060fe/datastream/OBJ/view