The art of scholarly reviewing: Principles and practices

The art of scholarly reviewing: Principles and practices

Janssen, M.F.W.H.A. (TU Delft Information and Communication Technology)
Bannister, F.E. (Trinity College Dublin)

2019

The quality and reputation of an academic journal can depend on several factors, but high-quality peer reviews are always a core requirement. Unfortunately, reviews are not always up to the standard that they should be. Poor reviews can result in a number of problems including sub-standard articles being accepted and good manuscripts being rejected. Good reviews are comparable to good papers; they require attention and dedication to write well. Although journals are different, it is important that reviewers approach their task with goodwill, i.e. that they approach a manuscript with an open mind, read it with care and attention and make comments that are constructive and show self-reflection. Reviewers need to know the evaluation standards and the limits of their own expertise and, if in doubt, not to be afraid to say so.

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:ab1181b8-e8c2-4d12-b08e-6506dcf31d9e

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.12.002

2019-06-28

0740-624X

Government Information Quarterly: an international journal of information technology management, policies, and practices, 36 (1), 1-4

Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.

Institutional Repository

contribution to periodical

© 2019 M.F.W.H.A. Janssen, F.E. Bannister